@InProceedings{NunesFerBarLucSil:2017:AnSoRe,
               author = "Nunes, Darlan Miranda and Fernandes, Manoel do Couto and Barros, 
                         Rafael Silva de and Lucarelli, Daniely Camargos and Silveira, 
                         Juliane Christine",
                title = "An{\'a}lises sobre Rede Vi{\'a}ria constru{\'{\i}}da em 
                         Superf{\'{\i}}cie Real e Superf{\'{\i}}cie Planim{\'e}trica",
            booktitle = "Anais...",
                 year = "2017",
               editor = "Gherardi, Douglas Francisco Marcolino and Arag{\~a}o, Luiz 
                         Eduardo Oliveira e Cruz de",
                pages = "1550--1557",
         organization = "Simp{\'o}sio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, 18. (SBSR)",
            publisher = "Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)",
              address = "S{\~a}o Jos{\'e} dos Campos",
             abstract = "Some analyses performed in geoprocessing require consideration 
                         concerning the dimensionality of data and information. As example, 
                         three-dimensional (3D) data require to be worked in Modeled or 
                         Real Surface, with the necessary assessments of relief and not 
                         just using Planimetric Surface, such as observations using a 
                         topography map, etc. In this sense, this works aims to study the 
                         implications of a road network analysis, more specifically in 
                         determining the optimal routes and service areas, considering 
                         these different types of surface (Real and Planimetric) adopted as 
                         reference. Using a road network modeled for the urban area of the 
                         city of Vi{\c{c}}osa, Minas Gerais State, were simulated 
                         hypothetical situations in order to find the optimal route 
                         (between two points) and service areas (from a specific location), 
                         taking the distances obtained from Real and Planimetric Surface as 
                         weight associated to the edges of the road network. Through the 
                         results obtained, we found significant differences in the analysis 
                         carried out according to the type of surface considered. For 
                         optimal route, was obtained a discrepancy about 10% (0.5 km) to 
                         the total length of the route using Real Surface in relation to 
                         Planimetric Surface. For service areas, it has been found that the 
                         greater abrangency, from the specified location, were for 
                         Planimetric Surface, since these distance restrictions adopted are 
                         smaller than the Real one. With this work, it was possible to 
                         demonstrate the relevance of Real Surface in analyses that 
                         requires relief considerations.",
  conference-location = "Santos",
      conference-year = "28-31 maio 2017",
                 isbn = "978-85-17-00088-1",
                label = "60085",
             language = "pt",
         organisation = "Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)",
                  ibi = "8JMKD3MGP6W34M/3PS4GSS",
                  url = "http://urlib.net/ibi/8JMKD3MGP6W34M/3PS4GSS",
           targetfile = "60085.pdf",
                 type = "Mapeamento",
        urlaccessdate = "27 abr. 2024"
}